برچسب: After

  • How iPhone Apps Are Changing After a Recent App Store Ruling

    How iPhone Apps Are Changing After a Recent App Store Ruling


    In recent days, iPhone apps have been changing. The Kindle app now lets people buy books directly from its site. Spotify is offering users free trials. And Patreon, a subscription service, is letting people pay creators more money.

    The changes are an early look at how a recent court ruling could transform the shopping experience on an iPhone. Last week, a federal judge ordered Apple to start allowing apps to offer promotions and collect payments directly from users. The decision makes it possible for apps to offer people new conveniences, like buying books directly from their website. The ruling also lets apps bypass a 30 percent commission that Apple collects on every app sale, which could lead to lower prices for consumers.

    For more than a decade, Apple required that apps use its payment system for purchases and collected commission on the sales.

    Now, all of that is open to change. Here’s what could be different in the future and why.

    Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who began working on this case after Epic Games sued Apple in 2020, ruled that Apple could no longer take commissions from sales that link out from the app. She also restricted the company from writing rules that would prevent developers from creating buttons or links allowing people to pay apps directly for their goods and services, and said it could not create messages — known as warning screens — that discourage users from leaving the App Store.

    Amazon asked to update its Kindle app to allow people to buy books.Credit…Kindle

    For years, Kindle has not sold books on its app to avoid Apple’s 30 percent commission. Now, it has added a “Get Book” button that directs users to its website to buy books. Similarly, Apple prevented Spotify from offering free trials to new customers, but now Spotify has a button on its app for a three-month trial.

    Other apps could begin offering links for buying directly from stores online, which would allow the business to avoid having to pay Apple’s 30 percent commission. Without having to pay those fees, apps could offer users lower prices, reducing a $10 monthly subscription to $7.

    Apple makes $11 billion a year from app sales in the United States, according to estimates by Morgan Stanley. It won’t lose all of that, but the bank estimates that $2 billion of that is now at risk.

    How much Apple loses will come down to how willing people are to change their behavior. The decade-old process for buying software and services on apps is not only familiar but also quick. People trust Apple with their credit card information. And the company makes it easy for people to cancel their subscriptions — keeping them all in one place. Many people may be reluctant to leave the App Store to make their purchases, and apps may prefer to maintain the current system.

    Now that Apple is required to allow apps to collect payment directly, without paying the company a commission, in the United States, other countries are going to press for similar concessions. Regulators in Europe, Japan and South Korea, which have been asking Apple to loosen its grip on the App Store, would not want their own citizens or developers to have to pay more than Americans did.

    Apple said it planned to appeal the ruling, but it would be challenging for the company to have the decision overturned. In 2021, the judge wrote a less prescriptive ruling. Apple skirted the rule by introducing a 27 percent commission for app sales. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sided with the judge’s initial ruling from 2021 and is unlikely to change its position, said Mark A. Lemley, a professor of antitrust and technology law at Stanford. “They should take their licks and let it be,” he said.



    Source link

  • Signal Clone Used by Waltz Suspends Service After ‘Security Incident’

    Signal Clone Used by Waltz Suspends Service After ‘Security Incident’


    The application that the Trump White House has been using to collect and securely stores messages sent on popular commercial encrypted apps has temporarily suspended service in the wake of a security breach, the application’s owner said on Monday.

    The application, TeleMessage, is owned by Smarsh, a company based in Portland, Ore., which provides tools for governments to comply with record-keeping regulations and laws. Last week, a Reuters photograph of Mike Waltz, then the national security adviser, showed that he was using the application to read Signal messages on his phone.

    On Sunday, 404 Media reported that a hacker had breached the Israeli company that makes TeleMessage and stolen the contents of some direct messages and group chats sent using its Signal clone, as well as modified versions of WhatsApp, Telegram, and WeChat.

    Smarsh declined to answer questions, but in a statement, a spokeswoman said that it was investigating “a recent security incident” and that, “Out of an abundance of caution, all TeleMessage services have been temporarily suspended.”

    The use of Signal by Trump administration officials came to light after Mr. Waltz created a chat on the platform to discuss strikes on Houthi militants in Yemen, but inadvertently added a journalist from The Atlantic to the group.

    It is not clear when Mr. Waltz started using TeleMessage. A federal judge ordered the messages from the original Signal chat be preserved, but government lawyers later told a court in a different case that messages from the original Signal chat had been deleted from one participant’s phone, that of John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director.

    Security experts have raised concerns about the service, noting that installing such an application to archive encrypted messages creates numerous security vulnerabilities. WhatsApp and other messaging companies are actively attempting to ban TeleMessage.

    The use of the TeleMessage system is something of a contradiction. Many people use encrypted apps like Signal so that information is sent securely and then automatically deleted. But U.S. government rules require officials to preserve their communications — driving some government lawyers to push for officials to use the TeleMessage clone.

    While the company claims not to decrypt the messages and to archive them securely, the hack on TeleMessage as reported by 404 Media raised questions about the company’s security protocols.

    Security experts have said the U.S. government should aggressively audit TeleMessage before continuing to use the service to archive Signal or other messages.

    In its statement on Monday, Smarsh said it had hired an “external cybersecurity firm” to assist in its investigation of the TeleMessage breach.



    Source link